Skip to main content.

Foreclosures Hit Record High

The number of foreclosures hit a record high in 2007, with more homeowners falling behind on their mortgage payments, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported Thursday. By the end of last year, two percent of all U.S. mortgages were in foreclosure, with 0.83 percent of loans entering the foreclosure process in the fourth quarter alone, the Washington D.C.-based trade group said. At the same time, nearly six percent of mortgages were past due, the highest delinquency rate since 1985. Subprime mortgages represented as much as seven percent of all outstanding loans, compared to 15 percent of prime loans. California and Florida accounted for 21 percent of all outstanding loans last year, along with 30 percent of mortgages entering foreclosure. Michigan, Ohio and Indiana had the highest overall percentages of foreclosures, but showed signs of easing in the months ahead. "Declining home prices are clearly the driving factor behind foreclosures, but the reasons and magnitude of the declines differ from state to state," Doug Duncan, the group's chief economist, said in a statement. Duncan said job losses and tighter credit conditions in Ohio, Michigan and elsewhere were leading to a lower demand for homes, leaving sellers with fewer potential buyers. Meanwhile, overbuilding in California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona had created a glut of housing inventory that would take time to work through, he added.

Are You Rich Yet?

Wayne Gretzky, the legendary hockey player, was never the strongest guy on the ice. What he lacked in heft, however, he made up for with a canny ability to remain alert and calm and to trust his instincts in the midst of a frequently violent frenzy. These qualities allowed Gretzky to become the greatest practitioner of the Canadian national pastime. Similarly, people who remain alert and calm and who trust their instincts in the midst of a frequently violent frenzy excel at what has become something of America's national pastime: trying to build a fortune in an economy marked by investment bubbles. Bubbles are generally viewed as the invisible hand's way of dashing entrepreneurial gains that came too easy, but the opposite is often true. By their nature bubbles present opportunities for entrepreneurs to make big profits. And we've certainly got our share of bubbles today. It's impossible to open the business pages without reading about bubbles (real or imagined) in real estate, Web 2.0, and clean technology. Of course, a bubble's narrative arc--a burst of frantic building and excess capacity, followed by outlandish hype and cutthroat price competition, and finally bankruptcy and consolidation--is nothing new. It happened in telegraph and railroads in the 19th century, in stocks and credit in the 1920s, and, of course, in the dot-com world in the 1990s. Every generation or so, a hot new technology comes along or theorists develop a new set of economic assumptions that supposedly change the rules governing economic and commercial behavior. As government policy encourages investment in a particular sector, promoters concoct pro forma numbers that extrapolate impressive short-term trends indefinitely into the future. (Remember the 1999 book Dow 36,000? It was something of a remake. In the fall of 1929, Yale economist Irving Fisher proclaimed that "stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau.") Drawn in by the promise of unfathomably vast markets, many bubble participants get hurt--especially large corporations, which have a knack for making giant bets at precisely the wrong time. In America, a good business idea gets funded--and funded again. Entrepreneurs stake out ground, and deep-pocketed investors and corporations follow. The result: Capacity always expands faster than demand. Three telegraphs connected New York City and Boston in the 1840s. A half-dozen transcontinental railroads were built in the years after the Civil War. Enough fiber-optic cable was laid by behemoths like WorldCom and Global Crossing (NASDAQ:GLBC) in the 1990s to last two generations. In each instance, unfortunately, there simply wasn't enough traffic to go around. Looking at bubbles through history, it becomes apparent that the best long-term business opportunities don't arise during a bubble but after the bubble bursts. Timing a crash is a difficult, perhaps impossible, proposition. Having studied the dynamics of bubbles and what usually follows, I believe entrepreneurs can draw some important lessons about when and how to expand businesses in booming fields that appear to be headed for a bust. They are: 1. Bubbles are bipolar. The frenzy and irrational optimism that break out during an upswing swiftly morph into paralysis and irrational pessimism come the bust. Corporations, embarrassed by the huge investments they made--often right at the top--are eager to write down their devalued assets and move on. When they do, the building blocks of good businesses are suddenly available on the cheap. Consider the case of Charles Merrill. He fled the retail brokerage business in the early 1930s. But in 1940, when Wall Street was still trying to shake off the Great Depression, Merrill was able to merge his company with E.A. Pierce Co., the nation's largest brokerage firm at the time, for less than $2 million. By 1944, Merrill Lynch (NYSE:MER) had dozens of offices across the country serving 250,000 customer accounts. And in the postwar years, as more investors cautiously dipped their toes back into the markets, guess who was there to welcome them?.

This means that people using standards-compliant browsers will see the same format and layout of your page.

Self-Employment Greater Among Highly Educated

Those who pursue a graduate education are 8 percent more likely to become self-employed, according to new research released by the U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy. In a working paper on the characteristics of the self-employed, Dr. Chad Moutray, chief economist for the Office of Advocacy, finds that education level, prior military service and household income are strong indicators for self-employment. While a graduate degree increases the chances of entrepreneurship the most, the study found that having some college education raised the likelihood by 3.3 percent, and among those who have a baccalaureate degree, by 4.4 percent. The study also found that the greatest predictor of self-employment is prior military experience, which increases the likelihood of becoming an entrepreneur by 11 percent. Additionally, homeownership increases the probability by as much as 7 percent and for every $100,000 increase in mortgage value, the likelihood that homeowners will become self-employed goes up by 2 percent.

Copyright © 2008, Adollaradayinmay.com

 

Personal Checks Contractor Insurance rolex replica
merchant account Fixed Rate Mortgages rewards credit card
Sohbet evden eve nakliyat Cheap Tramadol Free Shipping Ebay alternative Home Insurance California